Mental illness and inequality

Topics: Campaigns, Work and money, Social issues

Jane Harris Deputy Director of Public Affairs RethinkBlog post from Jane Harris, Rethink's Deputy Director of Public Affairs.

We heard this week that the government will repeal the duty in the recent Equality Act to consider the impact of new policies on socio-economic equality. It’s hard in some ways to say what impact this will have on any of us. The duty only started few months ago so what it might have achieved is hard to say. It will certainly go down as one of the shortest lived policies in recent memory - it only came into force last month. 

It seems an odd decision for a Government committed to fairness and protecting the vulnerable. We could debate until the next Parliament whether the socio-economics duty was the right answer to current societal inequalities. What’s certain is that current government policy isn’t enough to protect the vulnerable from inequality.

Too many people with mental illness are living in the breadline. Not through any fault of their own but through a combination of a benefits system that doesn’t recognize mental illness, an NHS that restricts mental health treatment and employers that see mental illness as a sign of weakness or danger. If this duty is going, we need a different plan of action to move people out of what can be years of hardship.

First, we need a benefits system that recognises mental illness. At the moment people are more likely to have worse health after some benefits reviews than they are to have a proper record of their ability to work. Independent research has found that 99% of people claiming benefits do so honestly, but so far government rhetoric is focusing 99% of the time on people being dishonest. This is an unfair reflection on many thousands of people who are simply unwell enough to work.

Second we need an NHS that really gives people proper treatment. Whether you’ve got a broken leg or a mental illness, if you don’t get health treatment, it will take longer to recover and get back to a decent life and back into work. The new GP commissioners will hopefully recognize the disparity in treatment for mental illness compared to physical illness and use their budgets to plug the gap. Some GPs seem to recognise that mental health care is simply not good enough in this country – we hope others will take a long hard look at their local services and work out better ways of treating people.

But giving the individual income and health treatment is not enough. Until we do something about people’s role in the new ‘Big Society’, people with mental illness will still face more of an uphill battle in getting employment and could fall into deprivation more easily than others. The Coalition has so far resisted calls from laissez-faire thinkers to repeal the Section of the Equality Act that ends employers asking job applicants about disabilities. The news on the socio-economic duty may be debatable, but there is no doubt that allowing employers to ask these questions affects people’s chances of getting into work. 41% of people with a mental health condition say they had not applied for a job because they believed they would be discriminated against. We sincerely hope that this is the only part of the Equality Act that will be repealed next year.

Comments

Please note: Rethink accepts no responsiblity for the content of comments in the blog.
1. At 07:53 PM on 21 January 2011 Whippies wrote:

ERISA Long term disability

I was blown away when I received a letter from my ERISA long term disability informing me that becasue I have a mental health diagnosis my benefits will be discontinued in 24 months. Patients with a physical diagnosis do not have their ERISA disability benefits discontinued. This is a clear case of discrimination. I have so much more data for this situation, but this is all that needs to be said to see the writing on the wall. Tired of the discrimination that will adversely affect my life even thought I have been a full time hard worker for over 15 years. Can someone please tell Congress how wrong this is and for them to update it with the mental health health care parity laws and other laws.
2. At 07:13 PM on 02 January 2011 kevin mcconnell wrote:

work

The 30% stats are poor, but remember that an awful lot of people out there are working and contrinbuting under a illness that has not been diagnosed. The divide line to what constitutes a illness is very thin and depends on a number of differing factors, location been just one of them. It seems parculiar to me that with two identical conditions, one can go undiagnosed whilst the other can be been stigmatised with all the ramifications that can make to his or her life. So which is better? To go through life hiding a serious mental illness 'undercover' where most certainly one is denied full work acheivement and success chances or receive professional support. diagnosis and help, where one is required to disclose ones illness and be subjected to the inevitable inequality? Neither is easy but I think If I could I would opt for the former.
3. At 02:07 PM on 12 December 2010 Able Scribe wrote:

Statutory inequality

IT IS TIME FOR PARLIAMENT TO STOP DISCRIMINATING AGAINST MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE BOTH WITHIN AND OUTSIDE WESTMINSTER. Within Parliament MPs are coerced into concealing the true nature of their life-experiences by not revealing any direct experience of mental ill-health, for fear of permanent Expulsion and facing ostracism and ridicule from the wider public. Outside, the outcome of this Stigma is to have us denied the benefit of their experience in shaping legislative measures that profoundly affect a large number of our citizens, who languish in private torment through being mis-construed, mis-understood, and mis-represented! It also sends the signal to the Public that it is OKAY to marginalise and exclude people with experience of mental ill-health - and disabled people in general. We MUST have our say that this is Wrong and Unjust. THIS CANNOT CONTINUE! the Movement EMancipating People to Have A Say In Society M E M P H A S I S http://hypoconcer.ning.com
4. At 08:36 PM on 05 December 2010 poppy wrote:

work/stigma/what?

Its getting worse, what are people supposed to do? its difficult to obtain work due to mental health diagnoses and it seems soon they are not seeming to be eligible for benefits either? The statistics are truly shocking with less than 30% of individuals with mental health issues in any kind of paid employment due mostly to the horrid stigma that surrounds the conditions. Its getting serious and when are we going to get angry about these proposed 'changes', and or when is anyone going to do something before a return to a dicensien and a draconian society, perhaps they can go back to the days of putting the mentally diagnosed into pens and charge members of society not diagnosed to stare and throw heavy objects at us? Far fetched look into the future and a horror story? not from where i am looking that scenario is a scary possibility. Poppy.

Post a comment

Please include your name and your email address. Your email will not appear with the comment, but whatever name you provide will.

Comments are moderated, and will appear when Rethink approves them. Rethink cannot guarantee your blog comment will be published.

Required
Required
Required
Maximum characters 1600
 
 
If you wish to remove a comment that you posted on this blog then please email online.team@rethink.org